October 28, 2009
Evolution and "Special Creation" Theory
A handful of the great natural scientists, who observed the almost imperceptible difference between certain species, and the numerous links that are found among the most different forms of animals and plants.They also noticed that quite a few species do vary substantially in their forms, colors, and habits. Thus they conceived the theory that the individuals in a species may be all produced from one another. The most eminent of these early naturalists was the French naturalist, Lamarck, who published an elaborate book in which he tried to demonstrate that all animals and all species are descended from common ancestors.
He attributed the modification of species principally to the event of variations in the conditions of their environment and especially to the desires and efforts of the animals themselves to improve their condition, leading to a mutation in traits and characteristics, due to the well-known physiological law that all organs are strengthened by incessant use, while they are impaired or even completely lost by disuse. The observations of Lamarck did not satisfy naturalists, and though some assumed the view that closely allied species had derived from one another, the standard impression of the educated public was that each species was a “special creation” quite independent of all others. At the same time, the great body of scientists believed that the change from one species to another by any known law or cause was impossible, and that the “origin of species” was an unresolved and in all probability insoluble problem.
Another outstanding work dealing with the theory of common ancestry was the renowned Vestiges of Creation, penned anonymously, but now acknowledged to have been written by the late Robert Chambers. In this work, the process of general laws was traced throughout the universe as a system of growth and maturation, and it was argued that the distinct species of animals and plants had evolved in orderly chronological succession from each other by the process of unfamiliar laws of evolution assisted by the action of environmental conditions. Although this book had a respectable effect in influencing common thought as to the extreme improbability of “special creation” of each species, it had lesser effect upon the belief of naturalists, as it made no attempt to deal with the issue in detail, or to prove in any single instance how the allied species of a genus could have originated.
At present, in the evolution creationism debate, the fact of “special creation” is upheld unilaterally and quite ferociously by creationists as an irrefutable law not only of nature, but of God. Divine laws are not to be questioned, and thus, the evolution creationism debate remains at a standstill.
Comments Off